tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6008037633121035579.post5307081124426726734..comments2023-10-22T11:57:34.718+01:00Comments on A Pint of Unionist Lite: Franz the First?O'Neillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02531858236570346203noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6008037633121035579.post-46223041624781252182008-04-08T10:52:00.000+01:002008-04-08T10:52:00.000+01:00I read an article a while back, possibly from Coch...I read an article a while back, possibly from Cochrane in the daily telegraph, stating that if we wanted to chage the religious provisions of the Act, it would have to be repealed and a new one passed (rather than ammended) as it would involve a change in the constitutional status of the Uk and also the Commonwealth. <BR/><BR/>He was against such a change, although for rather negative and O'Neillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02531858236570346203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6008037633121035579.post-59126786860966156222008-04-07T17:20:00.000+01:002008-04-07T17:20:00.000+01:00Well it more likely to be "amended" than repealed....Well it more likely to be "amended" than repealed.<BR/><BR/>In Denmark the present lot are regulated by two sucession laws. In the first half of the 19th century the king Frederick VII did not produce any heirs and all his near relatives were female. In those days women could come to the throne - more of that later - and so they elected a distant relative - a naval officer Christian of Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com